January 18, 2012

Turnover: HR Metrics – How and What to Measure

Filed under: General HR Buzz,Hiring & Jobs,Performance Management — Tags: , — Joyce @ 4:52 pm

It seems that January is the time for measurements, especially if you are like many of us who begin an exercise regimen in hopes of reducing our waistline measurement (my personal goal), or perhaps increasing our bicep measurement (if you are like my 16-year old son).  The world of HR is no different.  We often begin the year by defining our goals and objectives.  The last few years, there has been increased focus on measuring the value of HR.  Is HR merely overhead, or can our goals and objectives be measured and considered an integral piece providing input to the strategic direction of our organization?

I like to think the latter is true.  Although many of the processes and services we deliver are difficult to measure, I believe there are many areas that can be evaluated and assigned a quantitative value.  That is true in the area of turnover.  As our 1st quarter HR theme is turnover, we will be looking at it from various perspectives, building on what Olivia posted earlier this month relating to the costs and consequences of turnover.

HR metrics should be looked at as opportunities to provide valuable decision making data, assess internal controls, and improve performance.  However, metrics should be looked at as more than data.  The real value arrives when we can take the quantitative data and look at it from a qualitative perspective.   A simple way to look at the difference is as follows:

  • Quantitative – measures how much there is and usable for simple factors; should be compared to a “standard”
  • Qualitative – tells you what you are measuring and is reflective of actual workplace behavior

Olivia’s blog provided a calculation for turnover rate, which is an example of a quantitative metric:

  •  Dividing the number of terminations by the total employee census

The qualitative metric regarding turnover would take this data and complete the following assessment:

  •  Look at who left and why, digging into additional information such as what departments/managers had turnover, was it new hires or long-term employees, etc.

What are some other HR metrics that one might want to include when assessing turnover?  We will be expanding on this topic in our monthly whitepaper.  I believe you will be surprised at some of the new metrics that are emerging in the area of HR.  I hope you already receive our whitepapers, or if not you can sign up by clicking here.   Remember they are free (which results in a quantitative metric of $0)!

 

Share

October 23, 2009

HR Fact Friday: HR Poll — Compensation Audit Frequency

Filed under: Compensation,General HR Buzz,Salaries & Pay — Tags: , , , — Paul @ 7:50 am

It’s no secret that here at HRN we practice what we preach regarding best practices in compensation administration and employee performance management.  For example, at HRN we utilize Compease for establishing salary grades and comp levels based on current and accurate market data. We regularly update Compease with new and current compensation data compiled from the most trusted and respected sources. 

In my regular review of HR news and information sources I came across a live online survey on hr.blr.com asking this simple question: 

How often does your org. audit its compensation plan to ensure fairness and equity in employees pay? 

The reason this question stopped me in my tracks was because it is one of the first questions our compensation consultants ask prospective clients when discussing their compensation plan and strategy. So I was quite interested in seeing the results. And what I saw was surprising; especially when you consider that all repsondents are HR professionals who should know better. 

Source: hr.blr.com

Source: hr.blr.com

 

The good news is that 30% do audit their comp plan at least once each year. Hopefully these are all Compease clients because this annual update and review function is included in the solution. But what really did surprise me is that an equal amount; nearly one-third have never audited their compensation plan! Never? The next highest number of respondents at 17% selected the ‘less frequently than 3 years’ option. Now I understand this is an unscientific and uncontrolled online poll but even with a margin of error of 10% it’s still a significant finding. 

How can a company remain competitive and justify their bottom line if they have no true understanding of what other companies of the same size, in the same industry and geographical region are paying staff members for specific job functions and taking into account experience, education, and performance? With no researched and current comp plan in place a company is at risk of either overpaying employees, resulting in lower profitability, or underpaying key contributors and risking high attrition and turnover. Turnover costs the company money to recruit, hire, and train new staff. 

When I see data like this I am motivated as a marketer to do a better job in communicating the benefits of Compease to HR professionals. 

Having an annually updated and reliable comp plan in place does not have to be difficult, expensive, or time consuming. HRN has the solution. It’s called Compease. Give us a call and talk to a compensation professional or check it out online at here. Or better yet . . . attend a demo.

Share