<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>HR News &#38; Views Blog &#187; Title VII</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.hrnblog.com/tag/title-vii/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.hrnblog.com</link>
	<description>HR News &#38; Views</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 22:13:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Weekly Wednesday Acronym &#8211; ENDA</title>
		<link>http://www.hrnblog.com/2011/08/17/weekly-wednesday-acronym-enda/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hrnblog.com/2011/08/17/weekly-wednesday-acronym-enda/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Aug 2011 12:00:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joyce</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Affirmative Action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Compliance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Discrimination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employment Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General HR Buzz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Genetic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Management Practices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Title VII]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[discrimination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EEOC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ENDA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hrnblog.com/?p=2442</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Employment Non-Discrimination Act (ENDA) is not a new acronym.  In fact, it has been included in some form of the bills considered by Congress in every session since 1994 except in the 109th Congress (January 3, 2005 to January 3, 2007).  So what is ENDA?  Simply stated, it is a proposed federal law that [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hrnblog.com/2011/08/17/weekly-wednesday-acronym-enda/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What’s Good for the Signore is Good for the Signora</title>
		<link>http://www.hrnblog.com/2009/12/30/what%e2%80%99s-good-for-the-signore-is-good-for-the-signora/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hrnblog.com/2009/12/30/what%e2%80%99s-good-for-the-signore-is-good-for-the-signora/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Dec 2009 17:05:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jane</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General HR Buzz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Discrimination Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Title VII]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hrnblog.com/?p=1216</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[U.S. workers are well aware of discrimination issues at work.  Since 1964 Title VII has prohibited sex discrimination in the workplace.   Other countries are catching up to U.S. equal employment standards. A new Italian law has ended retirement age discrimination based on sex.   A good thing you say?  Most Americans would agree with that. However, [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hrnblog.com/2009/12/30/what%e2%80%99s-good-for-the-signore-is-good-for-the-signora/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Equal Pay Lawsuits just got easier</title>
		<link>http://www.hrnblog.com/2009/04/22/equal-pay-lawsuits-just-got-easier-2/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hrnblog.com/2009/04/22/equal-pay-lawsuits-just-got-easier-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 15:14:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jane</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Legal Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADEA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Title VII]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hrnblog.com/?p=681</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We knew that HR law would change with a Democratic Congress and administration. Well, the changes have begun. President Obama has signed the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act into law.  The law overrules the 2007 Supreme Court decision of Ledbetter v. Goodyear Tire &#38; Rubber Company, Inc., making it easier for employees to bring discrimination [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hrnblog.com/2009/04/22/equal-pay-lawsuits-just-got-easier-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Retaliation Claims Strike Again</title>
		<link>http://www.hrnblog.com/2009/02/18/retaliation-claims-strike-again/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hrnblog.com/2009/02/18/retaliation-claims-strike-again/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 20:27:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jane</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Employment Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[discrimination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[retaliation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Title VII]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hrnblog.com/?p=290</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We’re most familiar with discrimination cases and they do get most of the headlines. Retaliation issues and claims remain more obscure.  That’s a big mistake.  Retaliation claims are growing and are typically attached to discrimination allegations. They frequently arise when an employee or applicant claims that an organization took “adverse action” against him because he [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hrnblog.com/2009/02/18/retaliation-claims-strike-again/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Avoiding Retaliation Nightmares Just Got Tougher</title>
		<link>http://www.hrnblog.com/2009/01/28/avoiding-retaliation-nightmares-just-got-tougher/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hrnblog.com/2009/01/28/avoiding-retaliation-nightmares-just-got-tougher/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 20:23:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jane</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Legal Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[discrimination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[harassment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[retaliation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sexual]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Title VII]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hrnblog.com/?p=236</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Discrimination cases get the big headlines.  Often they include juicy tidbits involving sexual harassment or extremely boorish behavior by a Cro-Magnon boss.  It’s true that employment law cases involving discriminatory actions can be costly, time consuming, demoralizing, and embarrassing to an organization.  But don’t forget about the retaliation minefield.  The number of retaliation claims are [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hrnblog.com/2009/01/28/avoiding-retaliation-nightmares-just-got-tougher/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

