<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>HR News &#38; Views Blog &#187; Supreme Court</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.hrnblog.com/tag/supreme-court/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.hrnblog.com</link>
	<description>HR News &#38; Views</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 22:13:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Breaking News&#8230;Wal-Mart wins in Supreme Court Decision</title>
		<link>http://www.hrnblog.com/2011/06/20/breaking-news-wal-mart-wins-in-supreme-court-decision/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hrnblog.com/2011/06/20/breaking-news-wal-mart-wins-in-supreme-court-decision/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jun 2011 17:03:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joyce</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Compliance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Discrimination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[discrimination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Women]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hrnblog.com/?p=2332</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Breaking News… The Supreme Court has blocked a sexual discrimination class action lawsuit representing 1.6 million women against Wal-Mart.  The justices agreed that the lawsuit cannot proceed as a class action in its current form.  This reversed a decision by the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in San Francisco.  What’s next for the women [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hrnblog.com/2011/06/20/breaking-news-wal-mart-wins-in-supreme-court-decision/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>HR Fact Friday: Supreme Court Rules on Text Message Privacy Case</title>
		<link>http://www.hrnblog.com/2010/06/18/hr-fact-friday-supreme-court-rules-on-text-message-privacy-case/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hrnblog.com/2010/06/18/hr-fact-friday-supreme-court-rules-on-text-message-privacy-case/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jun 2010 14:25:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Employment Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-mail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[text message]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Workplace]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hrnblog.com/?p=1453</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Supreme Court overturned a 9th Circuit Court of Appeals ruling concerning employer-provided communication devices and workers&#8217; privacy rights. The Supreme Court ruled in favor of the employer, the city of Ontario, ruling that the search of the employee&#8217;s text messages was reasonable and not in violation of the employee&#8217;s Fourth Amendment rights. Background of [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hrnblog.com/2010/06/18/hr-fact-friday-supreme-court-rules-on-text-message-privacy-case/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Retaliation Claims Strike Again</title>
		<link>http://www.hrnblog.com/2009/02/18/retaliation-claims-strike-again/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hrnblog.com/2009/02/18/retaliation-claims-strike-again/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 20:27:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jane</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Employment Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[discrimination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[retaliation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Title VII]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hrnblog.com/?p=290</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We’re most familiar with discrimination cases and they do get most of the headlines. Retaliation issues and claims remain more obscure.  That’s a big mistake.  Retaliation claims are growing and are typically attached to discrimination allegations. They frequently arise when an employee or applicant claims that an organization took “adverse action” against him because he [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hrnblog.com/2009/02/18/retaliation-claims-strike-again/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Equal Pay Lawsuits Just Got Easier</title>
		<link>http://www.hrnblog.com/2009/01/29/equal-pay-lawsuits-just-got-easier/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hrnblog.com/2009/01/29/equal-pay-lawsuits-just-got-easier/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 21:47:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jane</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Legal Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADEA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[congress]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[discrimination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Fair Pay]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ledbetter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hrnblog.com/?p=239</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We knew that HR law would change with a Democratic Congress and administration. Well, the changes have begun.  President Obama has signed the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act into law. The law overrules the 2007 Supreme Court decision of Ledbetter v. Goodyear Tire &#38; Rubber Company, Inc., making it easier for employees to bring discrimination [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hrnblog.com/2009/01/29/equal-pay-lawsuits-just-got-easier/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Avoiding Retaliation Nightmares Just Got Tougher</title>
		<link>http://www.hrnblog.com/2009/01/28/avoiding-retaliation-nightmares-just-got-tougher/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hrnblog.com/2009/01/28/avoiding-retaliation-nightmares-just-got-tougher/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 20:23:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jane</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Legal Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[discrimination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[harassment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[retaliation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sexual]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Title VII]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hrnblog.com/?p=236</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Discrimination cases get the big headlines.  Often they include juicy tidbits involving sexual harassment or extremely boorish behavior by a Cro-Magnon boss.  It’s true that employment law cases involving discriminatory actions can be costly, time consuming, demoralizing, and embarrassing to an organization.  But don’t forget about the retaliation minefield.  The number of retaliation claims are [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hrnblog.com/2009/01/28/avoiding-retaliation-nightmares-just-got-tougher/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>HR Fact Friday: Pay Discrimination Measure Among First To Be Signed By President Obama</title>
		<link>http://www.hrnblog.com/2009/01/23/hr-fact-friday-pay-discrimination-measure-among-first-to-be-signed-by-president-obama/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hrnblog.com/2009/01/23/hr-fact-friday-pay-discrimination-measure-among-first-to-be-signed-by-president-obama/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 21:49:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Legal Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hrnblog.com/?p=231</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Senate approved a measure Thursday, January 22, 2009 that would make it easier for workers to sue for pay discrimination. It will now likely be among the first that President Barack Obama signs into law. The Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act, which passed 61-36, would restart the statute of limitations for filing a lawsuit [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hrnblog.com/2009/01/23/hr-fact-friday-pay-discrimination-measure-among-first-to-be-signed-by-president-obama/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

