<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>HR News &#38; Views Blog &#187; retaliation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.hrnblog.com/tag/retaliation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.hrnblog.com</link>
	<description>HR News &#38; Views</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 22:13:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>HR Fact Friday: Business Ethics Improved During Recession</title>
		<link>http://www.hrnblog.com/2010/02/05/hr-fact-friday-business-ethics-improved-during-recession/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hrnblog.com/2010/02/05/hr-fact-friday-business-ethics-improved-during-recession/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 15:45:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General HR Buzz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[misconduct]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recession]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[retaliation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hrnblog.com/?p=1249</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Finally some good workplace news to come out of the recession. In the January issue of HR Magazine it was reported that a devastated U.S. economy did not translate into an increase in unethical behavior at U.S. companies, according to a study from the Ethics Resource Center (ERC). Although the ERC&#8217;s 2009 National Business Ethics Survey [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hrnblog.com/2010/02/05/hr-fact-friday-business-ethics-improved-during-recession/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>HR Fact Friday: Job Bias Claims Based on Religion &amp; Disability Rise</title>
		<link>http://www.hrnblog.com/2010/01/22/hr-fact-friday-job-bias-claims-based-on-religion-disability-rise/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hrnblog.com/2010/01/22/hr-fact-friday-job-bias-claims-based-on-religion-disability-rise/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 16:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ADA & Disability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employment Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Americans with Disabilities Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[claims]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[discrimination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EEOC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[retaliation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hrnblog.com/?p=1231</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The number of workers claiming job discrimintion based on disability, religion, or national origin surged to new highs last year, as federal job bias complaints overall stayed at near record levels. The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) said Wednesday that charges of disability discrimination rose by about 10% to 21,451 claims, the largest increase of any [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hrnblog.com/2010/01/22/hr-fact-friday-job-bias-claims-based-on-religion-disability-rise/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Independent Contractor or Employee?    How Do You Know and What Does It Matter?</title>
		<link>http://www.hrnblog.com/2009/10/14/independent-contractor-or-employee-how-do-you-know-and-what-does-it-matter/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hrnblog.com/2009/10/14/independent-contractor-or-employee-how-do-you-know-and-what-does-it-matter/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 20:53:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jane</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General HR Buzz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hiring]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Recruiting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[retaliation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hrnblog.com/?p=1067</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Independent Contractor Classification Issues Coming Under Greater Scrutiny The independent contractor “issue” has become more visible in the last year, Congressional hearings have been held in which legislators have been urged to take action to address the issue of misclassification of employees as independent contractors.  Several states have also taken action to apply pressure to [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hrnblog.com/2009/10/14/independent-contractor-or-employee-how-do-you-know-and-what-does-it-matter/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Age Discrimination Case Makes Things Easier For Employers</title>
		<link>http://www.hrnblog.com/2009/08/10/age-discrimination-case-makes-things-easier-for-employers/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hrnblog.com/2009/08/10/age-discrimination-case-makes-things-easier-for-employers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 21:00:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jane</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Legal Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[discrimination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EEOC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[retaliation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hrnblog.com/?p=938</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the recently decided case U.S. Gross v. FBL Financial Services, Inc., the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that a plaintiff bringing an age discrimination case must prove that but for his age, the adverse job action at issue would not have happened.   Consequently, it&#8217;s no longer enough for a plaintiff to show that age discrimination [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hrnblog.com/2009/08/10/age-discrimination-case-makes-things-easier-for-employers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>HR Fact Friday:  EEOC Shows Spike in Discrimination Charges</title>
		<link>http://www.hrnblog.com/2009/05/29/hr-fact-friday-eeoc-shows-spike-in-discrimination-charges/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hrnblog.com/2009/05/29/hr-fact-friday-eeoc-shows-spike-in-discrimination-charges/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 20:47:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Employment Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Age Discrimination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[discrimination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EEOC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[race]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[retaliation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hrnblog.com/?p=766</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The number of age discrimination claims rose from 19,103 in 2007 to 24,582 in 2008, while retaliation claims rose from 26,663 to 32,690, just hundreds shy of overtaking the perennial number 1 type of charge filed with the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) &#8211; race discrimination, which rose to 33,937 charges. The figure for [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hrnblog.com/2009/05/29/hr-fact-friday-eeoc-shows-spike-in-discrimination-charges/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Athletic Club to Pay $161K to Settle Harassment Suit</title>
		<link>http://www.hrnblog.com/2009/03/03/athletic-club-to-pay-161k-to-settle-harassment-suit/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hrnblog.com/2009/03/03/athletic-club-to-pay-161k-to-settle-harassment-suit/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Mar 2009 15:05:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jane</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Harrasment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[discrimination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[harassment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[retaliation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sexual]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hrnblog.com/?p=338</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A Maryland athletic club has agreed to pay $161,000 to settle a sexual harassment lawsuit filed by the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), the agency announced. In the lawsuit, the EEOC alleged that Big Vanilla Athletic Club violated federal law by sexually harassing several female employees at the company&#8217;s locations in Pasadena and Arnold [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hrnblog.com/2009/03/03/athletic-club-to-pay-161k-to-settle-harassment-suit/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Retaliation Claims Strike Again</title>
		<link>http://www.hrnblog.com/2009/02/18/retaliation-claims-strike-again/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hrnblog.com/2009/02/18/retaliation-claims-strike-again/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 20:27:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jane</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Employment Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[discrimination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[retaliation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Title VII]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hrnblog.com/?p=290</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We’re most familiar with discrimination cases and they do get most of the headlines. Retaliation issues and claims remain more obscure.  That’s a big mistake.  Retaliation claims are growing and are typically attached to discrimination allegations. They frequently arise when an employee or applicant claims that an organization took “adverse action” against him because he [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hrnblog.com/2009/02/18/retaliation-claims-strike-again/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Avoiding Retaliation Nightmares Just Got Tougher</title>
		<link>http://www.hrnblog.com/2009/01/28/avoiding-retaliation-nightmares-just-got-tougher/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hrnblog.com/2009/01/28/avoiding-retaliation-nightmares-just-got-tougher/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 20:23:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jane</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Legal Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[discrimination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[harassment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[retaliation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sexual]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Title VII]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hrnblog.com/?p=236</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Discrimination cases get the big headlines.  Often they include juicy tidbits involving sexual harassment or extremely boorish behavior by a Cro-Magnon boss.  It’s true that employment law cases involving discriminatory actions can be costly, time consuming, demoralizing, and embarrassing to an organization.  But don’t forget about the retaliation minefield.  The number of retaliation claims are [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hrnblog.com/2009/01/28/avoiding-retaliation-nightmares-just-got-tougher/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

