October 14, 2009

Independent Contractor or Employee? How Do You Know and What Does It Matter?

Filed under: General HR Buzz — Tags: , , — Jane @ 1:53 pm

Independent Contractor Classification Issues Coming Under Greater Scrutiny

The independent contractor “issue” has become more visible in the last year, Congressional hearings have been held in which legislators have been urged to take action to address the issue of misclassification of employees as independent contractors.  Several states have also taken action to apply pressure to companies to revisit classifications.  It’s a subject that will likely see even more attention in the future.   Legislators have apparently heard enough complaints that some companies unfairly avoid their obligations by using contractors or that there simply is no justifiable reason to treat contractors so differently.

Independent Contractors:  A Money Saver and a Great Employer Solution?

The use of independent contractors has increased significantly in the last few years as employers seek to reduce costs and keep their workforces flexible. Whether a worker is an employee or a self-employed independent contractor imposes very different obligations on an employer.  Independent contractors are not on the payroll and do not enjoy many of the legal protections and benefits given employees. They also typically don’t count toward minimum thresholds required to determine whether employers are covered by certain federal employment laws. Generally, employers are not required to:

(more…)

Share

May 22, 2009

HR Fact Friday: Job ‘Angels’ Look After Victims Of Downturn

Filed under: Hiring & Jobs — Tags: , , , — Paul @ 3:02 pm

The grass-roots movement, which is growing quickly on Twitter, Facebook and LinkedIn, promises to give a boost not only to out-of-work individuals but also companies eager to do more with less, says Dan Kilgore, a recruiting consultant with Riviera Advisors who has watched the JobAngels momentum build. Kilgore has noticed professional recruiters becoming Angels, which means corporations should find job openings easier to fill.

Companies “now have free agents working on their behalf,” he says.
JobAngels dates to January, when Washington-based HR consultant Mark Stelzner suggested that each of the 700 people following him on micro-blogging site Twitter help just one person find a job.

“The response was immediate and overwhelmingly positive,” Stelzner said in a blog post. He proposed the name JobAngels and the group began to take off.

In early April, the JobAngels Twitter site had more than 6,200 followers. JobAngels also has a presence on social networking sites Facebook and LinkedIn.

It’s unclear how many jobs have been landed thanks to Angels, says Deirdre Honner, a JobAngels leader. But Honner, who also is associate director of human resources at Calvin College in Grand Rapids, Michigan, can cite anecdotes of success, including the case of a person she helped get a job at Ohio State University.

It’s hard to help people find work today. The U.S. unemployment rate rose to 8.5 percent in March, the highest level since 1983. The number of job openings in February was 3 million, down nearly 30 percent from a year earlier.

Still, the volunteer leaders of JobAngels are pushing forward. A Web site is in the works that will provide various resources, such as a service to match job seekers with Angels in particular geographies and fields.

But just as Clarence stuck with the troubled Jimmy Stewart, Honner says JobAngels isn’t going to disappear.

————–

Source: Reprinted from www.workforce.com 5/7/2009  Ed Fraunheim.

Share

September 19, 2008

HR Fact Friday: Gap Exists in HR Recruitment Priority vs. Funding

Filed under: Hiring & Jobs — Tags: , , , — Paul @ 9:15 am

It makes sense to think that an organizations top performance priority would receive proportionally allocated funding to achieve its mission. I’m in marketing and my top priority objective is lead generation. Therefore it should come as no surprise that when I prepare a strategic plan and budget forecast that the largest wedge of budget pie sought is to fund lead generation initiatives. That just makes sense.

That’s why the results of a recent HR priority vs. funding survey from BNA took me by surprise. Why would human resources priority vs budget allocation equation be any different?

Case in point: Recruiting and Retention. Human resources executives most commonly cite their department’s performance in recruiting and retaining employees as the primary factor in how top management evaluates HR’s contribution to the organization. But despite the importance assigned to recruiting, budgets are stagnant and the systems deployed are often inadequate.

(more…)

Share