<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>HR News &#38; Views Blog &#187; EEOC</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.hrnblog.com/tag/eeoc/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.hrnblog.com</link>
	<description>HR News &#38; Views</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 12:00:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>HR Fact Friday:  EEOC Letter Causes Diploma Controversy</title>
		<link>http://www.hrnblog.com/2012/01/13/hr-fact-friday-eeoc-letter-causes-diploma-controversy/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hrnblog.com/2012/01/13/hr-fact-friday-eeoc-letter-causes-diploma-controversy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jan 2012 18:40:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[EEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employment Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hiring & Jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[diploma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[disability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EEOC]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hrnblog.com/?p=2871</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An informal discussion letter from the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) is generating some controversy over whether an employer can require a high school diploma as an employment prerequisite. The informal letter (without the force of a law or regulation) was written in response to a question about persons who are unable to earn a [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hrnblog.com/2012/01/13/hr-fact-friday-eeoc-letter-causes-diploma-controversy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Weekly Wednesday Acronym &#8211; ENDA</title>
		<link>http://www.hrnblog.com/2011/08/17/weekly-wednesday-acronym-enda/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hrnblog.com/2011/08/17/weekly-wednesday-acronym-enda/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Aug 2011 12:00:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joyce</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Affirmative Action]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Compliance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Discrimination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employment Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[General HR Buzz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Genetic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Management Practices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Title VII]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[discrimination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EEOC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ENDA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hrnblog.com/?p=2442</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Employment Non-Discrimination Act (ENDA) is not a new acronym.  In fact, it has been included in some form of the bills considered by Congress in every session since 1994 except in the 109th Congress (January 3, 2005 to January 3, 2007).  So what is ENDA?  Simply stated, it is a proposed federal law that [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hrnblog.com/2011/08/17/weekly-wednesday-acronym-enda/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>More Men Making Harassment Claims</title>
		<link>http://www.hrnblog.com/2010/06/01/more-men-making-harassment-claims/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hrnblog.com/2010/06/01/more-men-making-harassment-claims/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jun 2010 18:57:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jane</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Employment Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EEOC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sexual harassment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hrnblog.com/?p=1425</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[An increasing number of men are making sexual harassment claims.  According to the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), 16.4% of 2009 complaints were filed by men. That’s up from 15.4% in 2006.  Groping, unwanted advances, vulgar talk, and sexually charged horseplay by other men have significantly contributed to the increase. Most observers believe that the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hrnblog.com/2010/06/01/more-men-making-harassment-claims/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>$1 Million Restaurant Beef</title>
		<link>http://www.hrnblog.com/2010/04/26/1-million-restaurant-beef/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hrnblog.com/2010/04/26/1-million-restaurant-beef/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Apr 2010 20:55:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jane</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Employment Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EEOC]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hrnblog.com/?p=1365</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) recently announced that it had settled a $1 million class action discrimination suit against Lawry’s Restaurants, a steakhouse chain.  Male employees had claimed gender discrimination, contending that for years the restaurant had only hired women for server positions. The EEOC had contended that since 1938 Lawry’s had not hired [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hrnblog.com/2010/04/26/1-million-restaurant-beef/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>HR Fact Friday: Job Bias Claims Based on Religion &amp; Disability Rise</title>
		<link>http://www.hrnblog.com/2010/01/22/hr-fact-friday-job-bias-claims-based-on-religion-disability-rise/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hrnblog.com/2010/01/22/hr-fact-friday-job-bias-claims-based-on-religion-disability-rise/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 16:46:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ADA & Disability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employment Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Americans with Disabilities Act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[claims]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[discrimination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EEOC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[retaliation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hrnblog.com/?p=1231</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The number of workers claiming job discrimintion based on disability, religion, or national origin surged to new highs last year, as federal job bias complaints overall stayed at near record levels. The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) said Wednesday that charges of disability discrimination rose by about 10% to 21,451 claims, the largest increase of any [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hrnblog.com/2010/01/22/hr-fact-friday-job-bias-claims-based-on-religion-disability-rise/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>HR Fact Friday: Workplace Bias Claims 2nd Highest Ever in 2009</title>
		<link>http://www.hrnblog.com/2010/01/08/hr-fact-friday-workplace-bias-claims-2nd-highest-ever-in-2009/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hrnblog.com/2010/01/08/hr-fact-friday-workplace-bias-claims-2nd-highest-ever-in-2009/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Jan 2010 15:52:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Employment Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EEOC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gender]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[litigation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[workplace discrimination]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hrnblog.com/?p=1224</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) received 93,277 workplace discrimination claims in 2009, down 2.2% compared with the previous year, the agency said Wednesday, January 6. The number of claims filed in 2009 was the second highest after 2008, the EEOC said, and monetary relief obtained for victims totaled more than $376 million, slightly lower than [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hrnblog.com/2010/01/08/hr-fact-friday-workplace-bias-claims-2nd-highest-ever-in-2009/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Age Discrimination Case Makes Things Easier For Employers</title>
		<link>http://www.hrnblog.com/2009/08/10/age-discrimination-case-makes-things-easier-for-employers/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hrnblog.com/2009/08/10/age-discrimination-case-makes-things-easier-for-employers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 21:00:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jane</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Legal Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[discrimination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EEOC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[retaliation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hrnblog.com/?p=938</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the recently decided case U.S. Gross v. FBL Financial Services, Inc., the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that a plaintiff bringing an age discrimination case must prove that but for his age, the adverse job action at issue would not have happened.   Consequently, it&#8217;s no longer enough for a plaintiff to show that age discrimination [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hrnblog.com/2009/08/10/age-discrimination-case-makes-things-easier-for-employers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Overtime Violations at the EEOC</title>
		<link>http://www.hrnblog.com/2009/06/08/overtime-violations-at-the-eeoc/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hrnblog.com/2009/06/08/overtime-violations-at-the-eeoc/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 20:53:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jane</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Employment Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[discrimination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EEOC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Over Time]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hrnblog.com/?p=777</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[According to the Washington Post, an arbitrator has found that the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, the agency tasked with enforcing federal discrimination laws, has been found to have violated federal overtime law.   The case arose out of a grievance filed by the EEOC employees&#8217; union.   In his findings, the arbitrator found nationwide and knowing violations [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hrnblog.com/2009/06/08/overtime-violations-at-the-eeoc/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>HR Fact Friday:  EEOC Shows Spike in Discrimination Charges</title>
		<link>http://www.hrnblog.com/2009/05/29/hr-fact-friday-eeoc-shows-spike-in-discrimination-charges/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hrnblog.com/2009/05/29/hr-fact-friday-eeoc-shows-spike-in-discrimination-charges/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 20:47:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Paul</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Employment Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Age Discrimination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[discrimination]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EEOC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[race]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[retaliation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hrnblog.com/?p=766</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The number of age discrimination claims rose from 19,103 in 2007 to 24,582 in 2008, while retaliation claims rose from 26,663 to 32,690, just hundreds shy of overtaking the perennial number 1 type of charge filed with the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) &#8211; race discrimination, which rose to 33,937 charges. The figure for [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hrnblog.com/2009/05/29/hr-fact-friday-eeoc-shows-spike-in-discrimination-charges/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Swine Flu Guidance from the EEOC</title>
		<link>http://www.hrnblog.com/2009/05/27/swine-flu-guidance-from-the-eeoc/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hrnblog.com/2009/05/27/swine-flu-guidance-from-the-eeoc/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 18:19:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jane</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[ADA & Disability]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ADA-Compliance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EEOC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[H1N1]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Swine Flu]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hrnblog.com/?p=762</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The EEOC has issued guidance to help employers ensure that they remain ADA-compliant while addressing workplace needs in preparing for the 2009 H1N1 flu virus (swine flu) or a similar health situation.  It includes guidance on such issues as what types of disability-related questions are permitted, what type of medical examinations  are legal, and what [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hrnblog.com/2009/05/27/swine-flu-guidance-from-the-eeoc/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

