<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>HR News &#38; Views Blog &#187; E-Verify</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.hrnblog.com/tag/e-verify/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.hrnblog.com</link>
	<description>HR News &#38; Views</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 22:13:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Will It Ever End?  Return of the E-Verify and No Match Rules</title>
		<link>http://www.hrnblog.com/2009/08/05/will-it-ever-end-return-of-the-e-verify-and-no-match-rules/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hrnblog.com/2009/08/05/will-it-ever-end-return-of-the-e-verify-and-no-match-rules/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 20:11:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jane</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Employment Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[E-Verify]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SSN]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hrnblog.com/?p=925</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Bush administration sought to crackdown on immigration violations by employers by formulating the E-Verify and Social Security No Match Regulations.  Implementation of these two tools has been delayed for review by the Obama administration, and in the case of &#8220;No Match,&#8221; a federal court.  Despite all the talk, rescheduling, rescheduling, and rescheduling, these never [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hrnblog.com/2009/08/05/will-it-ever-end-return-of-the-e-verify-and-no-match-rules/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Federal Contractor E-Verify Delayed Again (and Again Once More)</title>
		<link>http://www.hrnblog.com/2009/07/08/federal-contractor-e-verify-delayed-again-and-again-once-more/</link>
		<comments>http://www.hrnblog.com/2009/07/08/federal-contractor-e-verify-delayed-again-and-again-once-more/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 20:49:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jane</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Employment Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[E-Verify]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.hrnblog.com/?p=847</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The rule, which requires federal contractors with service or construction contracts over $100,000 and a performance period over 120 days to use E-Verify for new employees, has been delayed until September 8th, 2009.   The rule was to be effective on January 15, 2009 and has been delayed several times over the past months.    A few [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.hrnblog.com/2009/07/08/federal-contractor-e-verify-delayed-again-and-again-once-more/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

