July 27, 2011

Weekly Wednesday Acronym – ADEA

Filed under: Age Discrimination,Compliance,General HR Buzz — Tags: — Joyce @ 9:34 am

The Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 (ADEA) involves treating someone (an applicant or employee) less favorably because of his age.  The ADEA applies to employers with 20 or more employees, including state and local governments.  It also applies to employment agencies and labor organizations, as well as the federal government. 

The ADEA only forbids age discrimination against people who are age 40 or older. It does not protect workers under the age of 40, although some states do have laws that protect younger workers from age discrimination.

It is not illegal for an employer or other covered entity to favor an older worker over a younger one, even if both workers are age 40 or older.  Discrimination can occur when the victim and the person who inflicted the discrimination are both over 40.

Age Discrimination & Work Situations

The law forbids discrimination when it comes to any aspect of employment, including hiring, firing, pay, job assignments, promotions, layoff, training, fringe benefits, and any other term or condition of employment.

Age Discrimination & Harassment

It is unlawful to harass a person because of his or her age.

Harassment can include, for example, offensive remarks about a person’s age. Although the law doesn’t prohibit simple teasing, offhand comments, or isolated incidents that aren’t very serious, harassment is illegal when it is so frequent or severe that it creates a hostile or offensive work environment or when it results in an adverse employment decision (such as the victim being fired or demoted).

The harasser can be the victim’s supervisor, a supervisor in another area, a co-worker, or someone who is not an employee of the employer, such as a client or customer.

Age Discrimination & Employment Policies/Practices

An employment policy or practice that applies to everyone, regardless of age, can be illegal if it has a negative impact on applicants or employees age 40 or older and is not based on a reasonable factor other than age.

Share

April 22, 2009

Equal Pay Lawsuits just got easier

Filed under: Legal Issues — Tags: , , — Jane @ 8:14 am

We knew that HR law would change with a Democratic Congress and administration. Well, the changes have begun.

President Obama has signed the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act into law.  The law overrules the 2007 Supreme Court decision of Ledbetter v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company, Inc., making it easier for employees to bring discrimination cases by allowing them more time to do so.

(more…)

Share

January 29, 2009

Equal Pay Lawsuits Just Got Easier

Filed under: Legal Issues — Tags: , , , , , — Jane @ 2:47 pm

We knew that HR law would change with a Democratic Congress and administration. Well, the changes have begun.  President Obama has signed the Lilly Ledbetter Fair Pay Act into law. The law overrules the 2007 Supreme Court decision of Ledbetter v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Company, Inc., making it easier for employees to bring discrimination cases by allowing them more time to do so. The Act effectively increases the statute of limitations (or deadline) for filing federal pay discrimination claims, including those under Title VII, the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA), the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and the Rehabilitation Act. The Supreme Court had said that an employee must file a discrimination claim within 300/180 days of the company’s initial act of pay discrimination. Supporters of the Ledbetter law have argued that employees may not even be aware that pay discrimination has occurred until years later and so would be essentially foreclosed from taking legal action.

(more…)

Share