January 18, 2012

Turnover: HR Metrics – How and What to Measure

Filed under: General HR Buzz,Hiring & Jobs,Performance Management — Tags: , — Joyce @ 4:52 pm

It seems that January is the time for measurements, especially if you are like many of us who begin an exercise regimen in hopes of reducing our waistline measurement (my personal goal), or perhaps increasing our bicep measurement (if you are like my 16-year old son).  The world of HR is no different.  We often begin the year by defining our goals and objectives.  The last few years, there has been increased focus on measuring the value of HR.  Is HR merely overhead, or can our goals and objectives be measured and considered an integral piece providing input to the strategic direction of our organization?

I like to think the latter is true.  Although many of the processes and services we deliver are difficult to measure, I believe there are many areas that can be evaluated and assigned a quantitative value.  That is true in the area of turnover.  As our 1st quarter HR theme is turnover, we will be looking at it from various perspectives, building on what Olivia posted earlier this month relating to the costs and consequences of turnover.

HR metrics should be looked at as opportunities to provide valuable decision making data, assess internal controls, and improve performance.  However, metrics should be looked at as more than data.  The real value arrives when we can take the quantitative data and look at it from a qualitative perspective.   A simple way to look at the difference is as follows:

  • Quantitative – measures how much there is and usable for simple factors; should be compared to a “standard”
  • Qualitative – tells you what you are measuring and is reflective of actual workplace behavior

Olivia’s blog provided a calculation for turnover rate, which is an example of a quantitative metric:

  •  Dividing the number of terminations by the total employee census

The qualitative metric regarding turnover would take this data and complete the following assessment:

  •  Look at who left and why, digging into additional information such as what departments/managers had turnover, was it new hires or long-term employees, etc.

What are some other HR metrics that one might want to include when assessing turnover?  We will be expanding on this topic in our monthly whitepaper.  I believe you will be surprised at some of the new metrics that are emerging in the area of HR.  I hope you already receive our whitepapers, or if not you can sign up by clicking here.   Remember they are free (which results in a quantitative metric of $0)!

 

Share

January 13, 2012

HR Fact Friday: EEOC Letter Causes Diploma Controversy

Filed under: EEO,Employment Law,Hiring & Jobs — Tags: , , — Paul @ 1:40 pm

An informal discussion letter from the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) is generating some controversy over whether an employer can require a high school diploma as an employment prerequisite. The informal letter (without the force of a law or regulation) was written in response to a question about persons who are unable to earn a diploma because of learning disabilities, thus making them ineligible for jobs that require a high school education. The EEOC said that a diploma requirement that screens out someone based on a disability must be job related and consistent with a business necessity or it may violate the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). If it meets this requirement, the employer must then show that the person denied the job could not perform its essential functions, even with accommodations. Thus, according to the EEOC, while an employer need not prefer an individual with less qualifications (e.g. someone without a diploma who could not earn one due to a disability), it cannot flatly refuse to even consider him/her if they could perform the job with accommodations.

Is this type of information of interest to you? If you would like to recieve twice monthly HR legal updates such as that featured in this post you can sign up to recieve the HRN HR Legal Update eNewsletter. Simply go to: http://www.hrnonline.com/HR/WhitePapers/whitepaper-newsletter.asp.

 

Share

December 21, 2011

Reflections on Job Satisfaction

The end of the year is a time of reflection for me.  I look back on the year and typically do a mental review of the activities and occurrences in my personal life and my work life.  Oftentimes I wish I could have a few “do-overs”, but overall I am fortunate that I have more occurrences I would like to relive than do differently.  As I reflect on my career, some years I may have questioned if I was in the right field.  Other years I may have questioned if I was with the right company and satisfied with my job.  I have to admit, I tend to be fairly analytical so these mental discussions sometimes became rather intense and oftentimes I would end up with more questions than answers.

When it comes to job satisfaction, this is an area that is very important to most employees.  With the onset of a new year, and based on headline news the possibility of new jobs, many of your employees may be reflecting on their personal job satisfaction.  The Society for Human Resource Management (SHRM) recently released the 2011 Job Satisfaction and Engagement Research Report.  Good news!  The research showed the 83% of U.S. employees reported overall satisfaction with their current jobs.  Where the room for improvement comes is in the area of career development and advancement opportunities.  Only 40% of employees were satisfied in this area.

As employers, this should concern us.  Mark Schmit, SHRM’s vice president for research states “As we slowly come out of the recession, the war for talent will be back on.  When that happens, there is the potential for turnover given the dissatisfaction that employees seem to have with the real or perceived lack of advancement opportunities.”

When you reflect at the end of the year, it would be a good idea to think ahead.  What are you going to do as an employer to ensure your employees are satisfied with their jobs?  What opportunities exist in your company for career advancement and development?  We’d like to know what you are doing in your organization, so please share.

Source:  SHRM 2011 Job Satisfaction and Engagement Research Report

Other Sources:  WorldatWork

 

Share

November 10, 2011

Increasing ROI by Making the Pledge: Think Beyond the Label

Placing high value on diversity in the workplace is an undeniable best practice in any company.  Most businesses know that tax credits exist – both federal and state – for companies who hire people with disabilities.  Until recently, however, it was a challenge to determine the monetary value of those tax incentives.  An online resource, called Hire Gauge, was launched in September in an effort to show the true incentive in hiring people with disabilities.

Think Beyond the Label is a public-private partnership that advocates to increase employment for people with disabilities.  Users launch the free tool from their site and input their state and basic company information.  Based on answers to a short questionnaire, businesses can quickly see the aggregate tax credits and incentives they could receive for each new hire with a disability.

Consider this example company with more than 30 employees in the California IT industry (more than $1 million in revenue annually): Federal Worker Opportunities Credit, Architectural Barrier Removal Tax Deduction, savings of hiring through a vocational rehabilitation program, and credit for hiring a veteran with a service-connected disability (VA reimbursement).  The company is eligible for about $49,300 in total savings.  That figure is almost enough to pay the employee’s first year salary ($60,000).  If you’re concerned about the cost of making accommodations, research shows you shouldn’t be.  Over half of all accommodations cost less than $500 to implement, and most are no-cost.

When the questionnaire is completed, you can share your results on Twitter, Facebook, or by email to spread the word.  There are also informative state-specific links for more information.  The biggest benefit to this resource is seeing all of the numbers added up together.  Users can also find resources such as best practices for sourcing qualified workers and a tax incentives tip sheet.

Join me, and make the pledge to think beyond the label.

I Think Beyond the Label

 

Share

October 14, 2011

HR Fact Friday: What Happened to Common Sense?

Filed under: General HR Buzz,Hiring & Jobs,Work/Life Balance — Paul @ 6:00 am

Being both an HR and sales/marketing professional I look carefully at emerging market trends. I figure if I’m doing my job properly I am working 30-60 days ahead of the sale to generate leads and have trained, motivated sales staff in place to give demos and provide information.  As a hiring and people manager I also know of the considerable investment in time and company resources that go into each and every new hire.   Consider the job posting, on-boarding and days of hands on orientation/training to bring on new staff and get them to a point of self-reliant productivity. It is a big investment that doesn’t have a lot of ROI on the front end; especially if the new employee is replacing a top performer who left because the grass was seemingly greener elsewhere.

So why do some employers disregard workplace conditions and employee morale and expect longer hours and greater commitment from workers during tough times and then don’t understand when a trained and experienced worker quits–I mean this is a bad economy, workers aren’t supposed to quit. Nobody is hiring, right?

(more…)

Share

September 16, 2011

HR Fact Friday: Managing a Gen Y Workforce

Filed under: General HR Buzz,Hiring & Jobs — Tags: — Paul @ 6:00 am

For those companies that are actually hiring these days you may feel like the rules have changed from the status quo of 5 years ago when it comes to interviewing, hiring, and retaining new employees in the 21-28 year old age group. Why? Because none of the old rules apply to these younger, technically savvy workers collectively classified as Gen Y. When we baby boomers (of which I am one) say, “they just don’t get it” it is literally true . . . they don’t get it. How could they? The workplace and job environment has been completely transformed during their short adult life from the experiences of us more ‘experienced’ workers.  A recent article I came across on the SHRM.org website caught my attention and provides a good overview of how employers can attract and retain Gen Y workers. Bottom line; communicate effectively and provide flexibility.

The article reads in part:

Generation Y is taking over the world and the workplace—and employers who want to attract, engage and retain this huge workforce need to understand its preferences and communication styles, especially when it comes to workplace benefits.

(more…)

Share

July 6, 2011

Weekly Wednesday Acronym – WIN

This is a brand new acronym, introduced on June 23, 2011, and occurred right on the heels of the Supreme Court’s Wal-Mart employment discrimination case.   Congressman Jared Polis (D-CO), Senator Barbara A. Mikulski (D-MD), Congresswoman Rosa L. DeLauro (D-CT), Senator Kirsten Gillibrand (D-NY), and Congresswoman Gwen Moore (D-WI) have introduced the Women and Workforce Investment for Nontraditional Jobs (Women WIN Jobs) Act.

The purpose of “The Women Win Jobs Act” would be to provide women with help entering higher-paying job fields.  Currently, women represent half of our nation’s workforce, yet only are employed in 25 of 504 occupational categories, most of which are among the lowest paid except for teaching and nursing.  “Non-traditional” jobs, which employ the fewest women, actually pay 20% to 30% more than predominantly female fields.

The Women WIN Jobs Act would create a new federal grant program to help recruit, prepare, place and retain women in high-demand, high-wage nontraditional jobs.  For a fact sheet, relating to the bill, please click on the following link:

http://polis.house.gov/UploadedFiles/Fact_Sheet_-_Women_WIN_Jobs_Act.pdf

Share

May 25, 2011

Weekly Wednesday Acronym – KSAs

Filed under: Compensation,General HR Buzz,Hiring & Jobs,Salaries & Pay — Tags: , — Joyce @ 10:58 am

If you have spent any time working on job descriptions, most likely you have run across the term “KSAs”.  Individual KSAs are demonstrated through qualifying experience, education, or training and are defined as:

  • Knowledge – an organized body of information, usually factual or procedural in nature.  Often, knowledge may be specified at different levels, such as basic knowledge, working knowledge, and thorough knowledge.
  • Skill – the proficient manual, verbal, or mental manipulation of data or things. For example, having a skill of Active Listening – giving full attention to what other people are saying, taking time to understand the points being made, asking questions as appropriate, and not interrupting at inappropriate times – would be a skill requirement for a Teller position.
  • Ability – the power or capacity to perform an activity or task.   Abilities are sometimes the most difficult to define as they are somewhat subjective, referring to enduring attributes of an individual that may affect performance.  An example of an ability requirement for an Accountant would be Mathematical Reasoning — the ability to choose the right mathematical methods or formulas to solve a problem.

KSAs are an important piece of a job description as they define the standards to perform the job at an expected level.  They are also used in evaluating and determining the salary grade of positions. 

Did you know HRN has a complete library of job descriptions?  For more information, contact your HRN Client Service Specialist.

Share

April 25, 2011

They’re Back!!! The SSA Resumes Issuance of “No-Match” Letters

Filed under: Compliance,Employment Law,General HR Buzz,Hiring & Jobs — Tags: , , — Joyce @ 3:44 pm

After a hiatus since 2007, the Social Security Administration (SSA) announced that it would once again be sending “No Match” letters to employers.  The purpose of No Match letters is to advise employers that there is some discrepancy in the SSA records between the name of an employee and the Social Security number listed for that employee and the Social Security number listed on the payroll tax records submitted for that employee.

What should you do if you receive a No-Match letter?  The SSA advises you to do the following:

  • check your records to see if there is a discrepancy in the records submitted to SSA;
  • ask the employee to check his or her records to determine if the information was accurately recorded/reported;
  • instruct the employee to contact the SSA to resolve any discrepancy;
  • provide the employee a reasonable amount of time to resolve the discrepancy; and
  • document your efforts to resolve the matter.

That’s not all, however.  There is additional guidance from the Office of Special Counsel of the Civil Rights Division of the U.S. Department of Justice which cautions employers not to terminate or take any adverse action against an employee based solely on receiving information on a No-Match.  Instead, employers should follow up, as also recommended by the SSA. 

Another challenge for employers is that receipt of a “No Match” letter may give the employer “constructive knowledge” that there may be an issue with an employee’s authorization to work in the United States.  The Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) routinely requests copies of “No Match” letters during I-9 audits.  It is unclear whether documentation of an employee’s inability to resolve a discrepancy will satisfy ICE in the event of an I-9 audit.

So what action should you take?  It is recommended that you develop standard policies and procedures to address issues raised in SSA No-Match letters and that those standards be implemented in a non-discriminatory manner.

Share

April 19, 2011

BMW – Not just a fancy car!

You are out with your boss at a business luncheon.  As you sit down at the table, you begin to panic!  Which glass do you drink out of?  Is your bread on the left or right?  Here’s an easy way to remember:

BMW – Bread, Meal, Water.  As you sit facing your plate, your bread plate is to your left, your meal is in front of you and your water is to your right.

A few more tips:

  • Bread should be torn apart with your hands, not sliced with a knife.  Butter just one piece at a time.
  • Meats are also cut as they are eaten; do not cut your entrée  up all at once.
  • Salt and Pepper are “married” and should be passed together around the table, even if a table mate only asks for one.
  • If you do not care for coffee, turn your coffee cup over on the table.
  • Put your cell phone or mobile device away during the meal, checking it while you are dining tells others at your table that they are not as important as your text message, email or phone call.
  • Finally, when you are finished eating, place your silverware at 4 and 10 o’clock on your plate to signal to wait staff that you are finished.  Your napkin should be semi-folded at the left side of your plate.

Now, relax and enjoy your luncheon knowing that you have followed all the rules!

Share
Older Posts »