Payday loans

November 15, 2010

Employers Try a New Health Care Strategy

Filed under: General HR Buzz4:05 pm

As premiums rise, some firms make higher-paid workers bear more of the increase.

As health care costs continue their climb this enrollment season, more employers are adopting a tiered system that assigns bigger contributions to workers in top salary brackets and offers some relief to workers who make less money.

For years, companies have asked employees to contribute more to premiums and deductibles. Now the sticker shock is more jolting than ever, because so many firms are passing on to their workers most, if not all, of the higher costs.

A worker’s share of a family policy is approaching $4,000 a year on average, and is most certainly going rise in coming years. For lower-salaried workers, those additional costs have only compounded their struggle in a brutal economy.

More and more companies in the last year or so have begun signaling their recognition of the added burden shouldered by workers in low- and middle-income jobs by varying the premiums they pay based on salary.

Some corporations have gone further than others. This year, for example, employees at Charlotte-based Bank of America who make $100,000 or more a year will pay at least 14 percent more for coverage for 2011. But workers who make less will actually see their contributions decrease, although their deductibles and co-payments will stay the same. Employees earning less than $50,000 could see as much as a 50 percent drop in the amount deducted from their paychecks, as compared to 2010. The bank says it is making up the difference.

“We’re obviously committed to helping our associates and their families manage rising health care costs,” said Kelly Sapp, a spokeswoman for the bank, which employs 250,000 people with a wide range of salaries nationwide.

Consultants say the trend is likely to continue, as employers devise various ways of spreading increased health care costs among their staff and balancing that side of the ledger against fewer raises and other compensation.

Vanderbilt University has adopted a wage-based benefit program for 2011 under which premiums will remain the same for employees who make $50,000 or less, while everyone else will pay up to $75 more a month. “We’re trying to help those lower-paid employees cope with hard economic times,” said Jerry Fife, the vice chancellor for administration.

Even as companies warily eye the uncertain landscape of the new health care law, especially with the Republican midterm election gains at the federal and state levels, they also are seeking novel ways to deal with year-after-year increases in health care, because the share-the-pain era is coming to an end.

Corporations had absorbed some higher costs in recent years, along with their workers, but have recently passed all, on average, onto employees.

In 2010 alone, a worker’s share of the cost of a family policy jumped an average of 14 percent from the previous year, according to a recent survey by the Kaiser Family Foundation. In real money, that is an additional $500 a year deducted from a paycheck.

“It feels so much worse this year than it has in prior years,” said Helen Darling, president of the National Business Group on Health, which represents employers who provide health benefits.

Across the country, the percentage of workers with coverage in large companies whose premiums vary with their wages climbed to 17 percent in 2010, up from 14 percent two years ago.

“If health care reform hadn’t happened, there would be more companies going in this direction,” said Darling, alluding to the interim period between the law’s passage this year and 2014, when it is expected to take full effect.

At Vanderbilt, which employs 23,000 people, including groundskeepers, janitors and health care aides, the university was mindful that employees have gone with no or small raises for the last two years.

The university typically pays about 80 percent of the cost of coverage, with employees paying anywhere from $41 to $370 a month in premiums, depending on the type of plan.

The concept of tiered plans is not new, with employers that typically offer generous benefits, like universities, being quicker to try it. General Electric, for example, has long divided its workforce into separate tiers to determine how much an employee has to contribute toward insurance coverage. “Employees who are higher paid can afford to pay more,” said a spokeswoman.

Often, companies will keep premiums steady or lower for low-income workers by asking them to pay less of the overall increase, according to Joshua Miley, a principal at HighRoads, a Woburn, Mass., health benefits management consultant. Faced with an overall increase of 9 percent, the company might ask the lower-paid workers to pay 4 percent more, while the higher-paid group would pay 14 percent more.

“They’re doing it on the backs of the higher paid,” he said.

Of course, some companies may be reluctant to ask certain of their employees to pay more, especially if workers belong to unions that have negotiated a certain level of benefits for all their members.

Other companies could be wary of carrying out a system that could be viewed as unfair since salary may not be the best indication of household income. Some low-paid employees, whose spouse is a high earner, may not need the help, while a single person with a higher salary could be struggling.

The other concern is not being able to move away from a wage-based benefit structure once it is in place. “Once you ring that bell, you can’t take that out,” Miley said.

For most workers, however, the trend has been very clear: The increase in costs has easily outstripped any rise in their incomes. Since 2005, while wages have increased 18 percent, workers’ contributions to premiums have jumped 47 percent, almost twice as fast as the rise in the policy’s overall cost, according to Kaiser.

Companies have also become increasingly creative in the ways they shift costs. They have raised premiums or increased the size of the deductible workers must pay before their coverage kicks in. And they are increasingly asking workers to pay more of the cost of coverage for their dependents, or to pay more of their share of a hospital stay or an emergency room visit. “Employers do a bit here and do a bit there,” said Gary Claxton, a policy expert at Kaiser.

The result is that while employees may be paying more, they may not know how much more.

“Deductibles are straightforward, and even co-payments are straightforward,” said Mark Rukavina, executive director of The Access Project, a Boston advocacy group. “You need multiple spread sheets to figure this out.”

Source: Reed Abelson New York Times


No Comments

No comments yet.

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.