May 2, 2008

Genetic Discrimination Bill Passes

Filed under: Genetic — Jane @ 9:08 am

On May 1st,  by an overwhelming 414-1 vote, the House passed a bill that prohibits genetic discrimination by employers and health insurers. The same measure sailed through the Senate (95-0) in April.  President Bush has said he will sign the legislation.  The Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act prohibits employers from using genetic information in making employment decisions (e.g., hiring, firing) and health insurance companies from using the data to deny coverage or raise costs.  Proponents of the law hope that its passage will encourage more individuals to use genetic testing and become involved in medical research, thus improving health care. Another result may be to allow patients to be more open with their doctors regarding prior genetic tests and permit results to become part of their medical records. Individuals with family histories of genetic disease who could benefit from certain tests (e.g., breast or colon cancer) may be encouraged.   Still, some observers believe that patients should be cautious in revealing medical information.  It remains uncertain when the bill will be signed into law, although the health insurance portion would be effective one year after it becomes law and the employment section in eighteen months.  Don’t forget state law.  Some states currently have protections against genetic discrimination so, if applicable, you may need to see how these relate to the new federal measures.

  • Share/Bookmark

HR Fact Friday: Mental Health Days Go Mainstream

Filed under: Benefits — Paul @ 7:00 am

Business management and HR perceptions change in small increments over long periods of time. Given enough time, these small increments of change become accepted standards of practice. Here’s a prime example: The ridiculous term “Mental Health Day”. For some reason I cringe when I hear it used. 10 or 15 years ago this term was used somewhat covertly when confiding in a trusted coworker that you really weren’t ill when you called in sick last Friday; you just needed a day off and didn’t want to use up a vacation day. So you simply called in sick to have a paid day off.

So when did the phrase “mental health day” go mainstream and become a legit, openly stated phrase to justify not going to work but still getting paid?

Employers have long recognized that there were personal, unplanned circumstances that could require an employee to miss work. Yes, like it or not, employees did indeed have a life outside of the workplace. So employers granted a certain number of “personal days” to each employee as part of the benefit package to show flexibility and understanding for life’s stresses and curveballs.  What ended up happening was grateful employees were appreciative for the personal days and used them as fast as they could. Oddly there was no inverse reduction to the number of collective sick days being taken on an annual basis.  Employees it seems still felt entitled to use their ‘earned’ sick time however they wanted; even if that meant ‘wink, wink’ taking a mental health day every now and then.  But hey, thanks for the personal days. They are great!

(more…)

  • Share/Bookmark
« Newer Posts